In the United States, 1 of every 10 neonates is born preterm.1 Although a topic of extensive basic science, clinical, and public health inquiry and initiatives, rates of preterm birth have not significantly declined in the last 3 decades, and the United States continues to have the highest rate among high-income nations.2,3 Moreover, racial and ethnic differences in preterm birth rates are unacceptably disparate with Black mothers nearly 50% more likely to have a preterm birth as compared with their White counterparts.1 The etiologies of preterm birth and other neonatal outcomes, such as low birthweight, include various clinical and social determinants, including age, medical and obstetrical comorbidities, the incidence of multiple gestations, substance use, adverse environments, and racism.4,5 One definitive causal pathway remains elusive as there are likely multiple complex contributing factors.AJOG at a Glance
To evaluate whether care management in a high-risk population is associated with reductions in adverse neonatal outcomes.
Intensive care management, defined by ≥5 face-to-face visits during pregnancy, is associated with reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight rates. Although the rate reduction was greater among births to Black than White pregnant women, considerable disparities persist.
Pregnancy medical homes and care-management programs can offer additional resources to support people whose pregnancies are both clinically and socially complex.
The effects of preterm birth cannot be understated. Neonates born before 37 weeks gestation or with low birthweight have higher rates of death and disability, including respiratory difficulties, cerebral palsy, and developmental delay.6 From a societal perspective, the estimated cost of preterm birth in the United States is over $26 billion, not including costs associated with long term health outcomes, caregiver duties, or educational and other support services.5 Unfortunately, the complexities surrounding preterm birth are similarly reflected in many other aspects of maternal and newborn care, such as access to care, severe maternal morbidity, and maternal mortality.
In an effort to improve care during pregnancy and reduce the morbidity of complications, such as preterm birth, several states have started to design interventions during pregnancy.7,8 In North Carolina, the state-based Medicaid-managed Pregnancy Medical Home Program has been a unique opportunity to address adverse outcomes in high-risk pregnant people.9 Established in 2011, the program is a public-private partnership between Community Care of North Carolina, the North Carolina Division of Public Health, and the Division of Health Benefits (Medicaid) with the goal of improving the quality of perinatal care for Medicaid beneficiaries. Medicaid enrollees are screened for psychosocial and medical risk factors at their first prenatal visit and offered targeted care management throughout pregnancy. Thus, the community-based care managers team with the prenatal care providers to address clinical and social needs to promote optimal birth outcomes.
There are limited data on the impact of the Pregnancy Medical Home on maternal or neonatal outcomes, particularly in relation to the efficacy of care management in high-risk pregnancies. The objective of this research is to measure the association between care management in pregnancy and adverse neonatal outcomes, specifically preterm birth and low birthweight and whether there is a differential impact by race. This analysis is significant as it is among the first of its kind to demonstrate how state-based Medicaid innovation can influence health outcomes and the quality of care that is provided to high-risk pregnant people.